Admissions

State of Colorado

U.S. District Court, Colorado 1971
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

State of Pennsylvania

United States Claims Court

U.S. District Court, Northern

District of California

U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan 1996

U.S. District Court, Arizona

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana

U.S. District Court, Central District of California 2003
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin 2007
U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska

Education:

University of Denver College of Law, Juris Doctor.

Fort Lewis College, Bachelor of Arts.

Mr. Yates' national litigation practice has established him as one of the top trial lawyers in Denver today. During his 39 years of law practice, Mr. Yates has tried in excess of 85 civil cases in a broad spectrum of disputes involving toxic torts, environmental litigation including electromagnetic field defense, insurance coverage disputes, construction claims, design/build contract disputes and a wide variety of complex commercial disputes in the United States and abroad.

Mr. Yates has extensive experience in insurance coverage and bad faith insurance litigation, trying cases throughout the western United States. Mr. Yates has handled matters in insurance coverage and bad faith insurance law in Colorado, Texas, Wisconsin, Illinois, California, New Mexico, Missouri, New Mexico, Nevada, Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas, Arizona and Washington State. In 1997, Mr. Yates first-chaired a successful trial defense of a $9 million coverage and bad faith claim against a Lloyd's of London syndicate. In January 2000, Mr. Yates successfully defended Protection Mutual Insurance Company in Illinois state court in a $5,000,000 insurance bad faith case brought by a large metal manufacturer. The bad faith claim was dismissed on the eve of trial and, following a two-week trial, the jury found in favor of Protection on Plaintiff's claim for additional business interruption losses.

In 2004, Mr. Yates first-chaired two successful defenses involving breach of contract and insurance bad faith, one in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado entitled Leprino Foods Co. v. Factory Mutual Ins. Co. , and one in the United States District Court for the Central District of California entitled Landmark Hotels v. Continental Casualty Ins. Co. Combined, the claims sought over $22,500,000 with both cases resulting in full defense verdicts.

Mr. Yates leads the firm's representation of Factory Mutual Global Insurance Company and Factory Mutual Affiliated in the first-party property area, handling subrogation claims, coverage defense and bad faith defense. He has also represented insurance companies in E&O claims as well as MAI appraisal. In the first-party property area, Mr. Yates has handled significant matters concerning business interruption calculations, as well as business valuations. He has also participated in appraisals where business valuation and losses were in dispute.

In 1994, Mr. Yates successfully represented the General Assembly of the State of Colorado (Colorado's state legislative branch) against an injunctive claim action brought by several members of the disabled community in Colorado under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). The Plaintiff group attempted to halt a special legislative session due to the State's alleged failures to comply with the ADA in the State Capitol building. Following a several-day, emotionally charged hearing in federal court, Mr. Yates successfully brought the Plaintiff's group and the State Legislature to terms on corrective measures in the State Capitol building, thereby allowing the participation of the citizen's group in the special session.

For many years, Mr. Yates has been involved in the litigation and trial of construction disputes and claims. He is a member of the United States Claims Court of Washington, D.C., where he successfully litigated a case of first impression on the interpretation of 48 C.F.R. § 52.212-11, Variation of Estimated Quantity Clause, in federal contracts. Mr. Yates is a past member of the Colorado Contractor's Association and has litigated several major cases in both state and federal courts, as well as the Federal Board of Contract Appeals.

Mr. Yates also has significant experience in environmental litigation. He was lead counsel on behalf of the City of Denver in City and County of Denver v. Adolph Coors, Inc., et al. (U.S. District Court, District of Colorado). The City brought the case under the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq ., commonly known as Superfund. In that matter, Mr. Yates led a team of lawyers against 38 potential responsible parties (PRP) in seeking the costs of cleanup of the Lowry Landfill site. This matter was settled one day prior to trial with the defendants agreeing to pay the City for over eighty percent (80%) of the cost of clean up, which resulted in a multi-million dollar settlement for the City. Over 20 expert witnesses were effectively used in this case.

Mr. Yates first-chaired another CERCLA matter on behalf of the City of Denver, City and County of Denver v. Alumet, et al. (U.S. District Court, District of Colorado). In this case, the City of Denver brought an action for costs of cleanup of a Superfund site against 23 defendants. The plaintiff had requested $68 million in damages in that case. In conjunction with attorneys from other firms, Mr. Yates has participated in the litigation of other environmental cost recovery actions including, most recently, the settlement of a Superfund case in western Michigan, OCI PRP Group v. Total Petroleum, Inc. , 58 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. Mich. 1999) that resulted in a multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of a multi-party PRP Group.

Mr. Yates has had extensive first-chair trial experience in federal and state courts in both bench and jury trials. He has litigated numerous cases throughout Colorado and the West. His bar admissions include the State of Colorado, State of Pennsylvania, United States District Courts for the District of Colorado, Northern and Central Districts of California, District of Kansas, Northern District of Illinois, Southern District of Indiana, District of Arizona, Western District of Michigan and Eastern District of Wisconsin, as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. He has also been specially admitted for specific cases in New Mexico, Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington and Utah.

Mr. Yates successfully represented Newmont Mining Company in a products liability case, achieving a settlement in excess of $12 million, following two unsuccessful appeals by the defendants to the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Mr. Yates also has significant public service experience, having served as the La Plata County Attorney, as a member of the Colorado State Highway Commission, serving two terms as chairman, and has served on the Committee on Conduct for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Mr. Yates was also appointed by the Colorado Attorney General as a Special Assistant Attorney General to represent the Colorado Department of Highways in a product liability case against a major chemical manufacturer.

Mr. Yates is an associate member of the Loss Executives Association and is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, which requires admission by achieving a trial verdict and award in the amount of $1 million or more. Mr. Yates has had two such verdicts, as well as multi-million dollar settlement of a major case.

A graduate of Ft. Lewis College and the University of Denver College of Law, Mr. Yates also frequently authors and lectures on litigation skills and environmental law. Mr. Yates is also currently an Adjunct Professor in the Business College of the University of Denver.

Reported Cases:

Reddick v. Durango Herald, et al., 719 P.2d 340 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986); Burnett Construction Company v. United States, 26 Ct. Cl. 296 (1992); City and County of Denver v. Adolph Coors., et al., (D. Colo. 1992); City and County of Denver v. Alumet, et. al., (D. Colo. 1994); Organic Chemical Site PRP Group v. Total Petroleum Inc., 6 F. Supp.2d 660 (W.D. Mich. 1998); Organic Chemical Site Group v. Total Petroleum Inc., 58 F. Supp.2d 755 (W.D. Mich. 1999); Lyon Metal Products, LLC v. Protection Mut. Ins. Co., 254 Ill.Dec. 455, 747 N.E.2d 495 (Ill.App.Ct. 2001); Agritrack, Inc. v. DeJohn Housemoving, Inc., 25 P.3d 1187 (Colo. 2001); Wausau Business Ins. Co. v. U.S. Motels Mgmt., Inc., 341 F.Supp.2d 1180 (D. Colo. 2004); Continental Casualty Company v. Landmark Hotels, LLC, 184 Fed.Appx. 649 (2006); CWCapital Asset Mgmt. LLC v. Wausau Bus. Ins. Co., No. 04-08-00457-CV, 2009 WL 1900413 (Tex. App. San Antonio July 1, 2009, no pet. h.)(mem. op.).

Selected Activities:

Author
“Interpretation of 48 CFR 52.212-11, Variation in Estimated Quantity Clause,” Construction Law Advisor, No. 7, July 1992.

“Defense Against Toxic Torts and Citizen Suits for Federal Facilities and
Contractors,” Environmental Management Review, Government Law
Institute, No. 30, 4th Quarter 1993.

“Mitigating Construction Claims—Build It and the Claims Will Come,”
Preventive Law Reporter, National Center for Preventive Law, Vol. 14,
No. 4, Winter 1995.

Chapter on Colorado Law, “Design/Build Cookbook,” American Bar
Association Forum on the Construction Industry, Dallas, Texas, May 1996.

Chapter on Colorado Law, “Design/Build Deskbook,” American Bar
Association Construction Law Section, 2nd Edition, 2000.

Chapter on Colorado Law, “Design/Build Desktop,” American Bar
Association Forum on the Construction Industry, Dallas, Texas, 2002 Update.

Chapter on Colorado Law, “Design/Build Deskbook,” American Bar
Association Construction Law Section, 4th Edition, 2010.

Reddick v. Durango Herald, et al., 719 P.2d 340 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986); Burnett Construction Compan

Lecturer
The New Defense Mission – Defense Against Toxic Torts and Citizen Suits, Federal Facility 1993 Environmental Update Seminar, Government Institutes, Inc.

The New Defense Mission – Defense Against Toxic Torts and Citizen Suits, Fundamentals of Colorado Environmental Law Compliance Course 1994, Government Institutes, Inc.

Rule 11, Ethics and Sanctions, The Impact of Recent Changes in Federal Civil Procedure, April 1994, sponsored by The Practicing Bar of the Unites States District Court for the District of Colorado.

“Build It and the Claims Will Come,” Claims Mitigation for the Project
Owner Seminar presented by URS Consultants, Inc., 1995. La Plata
County Attorney, 1977-79.

“Overview of the Problem, Handling Mold Infestation Scenario, and Ways to Minimize or Avoid Risk of Mold Claims,” The Mold Challenge in Colorado,
June 2003, National Business Institute.

“Overview of the Problem, The Present State of Mold Litigation, and Insurance Coverage for Mold Claims,” The Mold Challenge in Colorado, April 2004, National Business Institute.

Member
Denver, Colorado and American Bar Associations; Colorado Trial Lawyers Association; Million Dollar Advocates Forum, a group of U.S. trial lawyers who have successfully won at least one trial which has resulted in recovery of a minimum of $1 million for their client.

Colorado Highway Commission: Vice Chairman (1985-90) and Chairman (1988-90)

Committee on Conduct, United States District Court District of Colorado: Panel Chairman (1990-1993)

[Professionals Index Page]